Home › Exam notes › UGC NET › Research Ethics and Academic Integrity

Research Ethics and Academic Integrity

Higher Education, Teaching & Research

Useful for: UGC NET, Bihar Assistant Professor, CSIR NET, Central Univ./IIT/NIT Faculty, MP Assistant Professor, OPSC Assistant Professor, OPSC PGT, OSSC Art Education Instructor

and 14 more exams

OSSC Economics, OSSC English, OSSC Foundation Course, OSSC Geography, OSSC History, OSSC Mathematics, OSSC Odia, OSSC Physical Education Instructor, OSSC Political Science, Rajasthan Assistant Professor, Rajasthan 1st Grade School Lecturer, SSB Lecturer / PGT, SSB Lecturer (Degree Colleges), UP Assistant Professor

हिंदी में पढ़ें

Overview

Research ethics protect participants and the integrity of knowledge through consent, confidentiality, honesty and avoidance of harm.

Key points

Participants must give informed consent and may withdraw at any time.
Confidentiality and anonymity protect participants’ identities.
Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are serious misconduct.
Research involving people usually needs ethics committee approval.
Special care is needed with children and vulnerable groups (parental consent and child assent).
UGC’s 2018 regulations on plagiarism treat similarity up to 10% as level 0 (no penalty) and set penalties above that.

Explanation

Data must be stored securely.
Conflicts of interest should be declared.
Authorship should reflect real contributions.
Results must be reported honestly, including negative findings.
Deception is allowed only with strong justification and debriefing.

Step by step

Identify the concept, law or policy the question is testing.
Recall the exact provision, thinker or principle.
Prefer inclusive, rights-based and evidence-based options; reject punitive or exclusionary ones.

Examples

A researcher records students’ names with their test scores in a public report → breach of confidentiality.
A study on children takes parental consent and the child’s agreement → consent and assent.
Copying paragraphs from a paper without citation → plagiarism.

Traps and advanced points

Trap: Skipping consent.
Trap: Changing data to fit a hypothesis.
Trap: Using children’s data without parental permission.

Quick revision

Consent, confidentiality, no harm, honesty.
Fabrication, falsification, plagiarism.
UGC 2018: ≤10% level 0.

Practice MCQs

During a research-methods workshop on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. which statement about Research Ethics is NOT appropriate?
1. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
4. Research Ethics should be interpreted according to its purpose and context.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (b) Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.. The NOT-appropriate statement is: Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
Choose the most defensible exam-ready conclusion about Research Ethics.
1. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
2. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
3. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (c) Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.. Choose the most defensible exam-ready conclusion about Research Ethics.: Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
Which statement about Research Ethics is NOT appropriate?
1. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
4. Research Ethics should be interpreted according to its purpose and context.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (b) Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.. The NOT-appropriate statement is: Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
While reviewing a study proposal on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. A teacher wants to apply Research Ethics correctly. Which action is most appropriate?
1. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (a) Document methods honestly and protect participant information.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
During a research-methods workshop on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. Choose the most defensible exam-ready conclusion about Research Ethics.
1. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
2. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
3. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (c) Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
While planning a small research study on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. Choose the most defensible exam-ready conclusion about Research Ethics.
1. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
2. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
3. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (c) Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
A teacher wants to apply Research Ethics correctly. Which action is most appropriate?
1. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (a) Document methods honestly and protect participant information.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
While planning a small research study on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. A teacher wants to apply Research Ethics correctly. Which action is most appropriate?
1. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (a) Document methods honestly and protect participant information.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
While planning a small research study on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. which statement about Research Ethics is NOT appropriate?
1. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
4. Research Ethics should be interpreted according to its purpose and context.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (b) Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.. The NOT-appropriate statement is: Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
During a research-methods workshop on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. A teacher wants to apply Research Ethics correctly. Which action is most appropriate?
1. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (a) Document methods honestly and protect participant information.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
While reviewing a study proposal on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. which statement about Research Ethics is NOT appropriate?
1. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
4. Research Ethics should be interpreted according to its purpose and context.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (b) Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.. The NOT-appropriate statement is: Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
While reviewing a study proposal on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. Choose the most defensible exam-ready conclusion about Research Ethics.
1. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
2. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
3. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (c) Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
During data-collection planning on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. A teacher wants to apply Research Ethics correctly. Which action is most appropriate?
1. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (a) Document methods honestly and protect participant information.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
During data-collection planning on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. which statement about Research Ethics is NOT appropriate?
1. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
2. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
3. Document methods honestly and protect participant information.
4. Research Ethics should be interpreted according to its purpose and context.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (b) Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.. The NOT-appropriate statement is: Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
During data-collection planning on Research Ethics, the team checks the design before collecting evidence. Choose the most defensible exam-ready conclusion about Research Ethics.
1. Changing inconvenient observations is acceptable if it improves the result.
2. Research Ethics is useful only for record keeping and has no effect on learning.
3. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.
4. Research Ethics should be applied identically in every situation without checking learner needs.
Read chapter notes · Similar questions
Show answer
Answer: (c) Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.. Research integrity rejects fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and requires responsible handling of participants/data.